<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8" standalone="yes"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"><channel><title>Followup on /usr</title><link>https://slashusr.anupamsg.me/tags/followup/</link><description>Recent content in Followup on /usr</description><generator>Hugo</generator><language>en-us</language><lastBuildDate>Sun, 17 Jan 2010 00:00:00 +0000</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://slashusr.anupamsg.me/tags/followup/index.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/><item><title>gnuplot with AquaTerm on OSX Snow Leopard</title><link>https://slashusr.anupamsg.me/2010/01/17/gnuplot-with-aquaterm-on-osx-snow-leopard/</link><pubDate>Sun, 17 Jan 2010 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>https://slashusr.anupamsg.me/2010/01/17/gnuplot-with-aquaterm-on-osx-snow-leopard/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;The &lt;a href="http://www.gnuplot.info/"&gt;gnuplot&lt;/a&gt; graphing utility has always had excellent support for multiple terminal types. While the X11 terminal is a satisfactory GUI view for the graphs, I prefer to use the &lt;a href="http://sourceforge.net/projects/aquaterm/"&gt;AquaTerm&lt;/a&gt; terminal on OSX as it is more ‘Mac-like’ and feels more natural.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Also, I do prefer to compile gnuplot by myself on OSX rather than downloading the pre-packaged binaries - as this gives me more control over the compilation (including getting around the stupid Apple readline bug - where Apple has essentially shipped a broken readline by using libedit to emulate the non-existent libreadline).&lt;/p&gt;</description></item></channel></rss>